Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn passengers. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn passengers. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Ba, 14 tháng 5, 2013

One-third of airline passengers confess to leaving gadgets on inflight

  • cellphone_inflightistock.jpg

Ever forget to turn off your phone while flying? You’re not alone.

According to a new joint study released last week by the Airline Passenger Experience Association (APEX) and the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), almost one third of fliers don’t heed the on board, pre-take-off warning, “Please turn off all personal electronic devices, including laptops and cell phones.”

In the study, Portable Electronic Devices on Aircraft, almost one-third (30 percent) of respondents reported they have accidently left their portable electronic devices (PED) turned on during a flight. Of those passengers who accidently left their gizmos turned on inflight, 61 percent said the device was a smartphone.

“This study showed us that most travelers are using their PEDs as often as possible while traveling, and many would like even more opportunities to use their devices” Russell A. Lemieux, APEX executive director said in a press release.  “The data in the study reveals important insights into actual passenger behavior, which we hope the FAA will find useful as it deliberates on this issue.”

Four in 10 passengers would like to use their gadgets during all phases of flight, including take-off and landing, according to the study. Currently, FAA rules mandate passengers turn electronic devices off below 10,000 feet in order to mitigate interference with the aircraft’s navigation systems during critical phases of flight.

The report was conducted through a telephone survey of 1,629 US adults between Dec. 14-18, 2012, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.43 percent. Results of the study were shared with the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as it reviews its policies for inflight PED use.


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 24 tháng 4, 2013

Virgin America allows passengers to send each other a drink

  • virgin_flirting.jpg

    Virgin America now allows people on its flights the ability to send drinks, a meal or snack to fellow passengers that catch their eye.Virgin America

Virgin America has launched a new service that allows people the ability to send drinks, a meal or snack to fellow passengers that catch their eye. 

The airline announced that the new feature uses the airline's existing Red on-demand food ordering system to send a cocktail to that passenger of interest. Just locate them on Virgin's digital seat map, browse the menu and have a drink, snack or meal sent over.  You can even follow up with a text message.

Virgin launched the service to mark the start of its Los Angeles to Las Vegas service, but it's available on all of its U.S. flights.

Airlines are increasingly getting into the matching game. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines introduced a service called “meet and seat” that lets travelers link Facebook and LinkedIn profiles to their check-in information.

Malaysia Airlines has a different service using Facebook that lets passengers see which friends are taking the same flight or visiting a destination at the same time.

Virgin boss Sir Richard Branson, who introduced the airline's new feature in a video, said the chances of deplaning with a plus-one are at least 50 percent.


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 8 tháng 4, 2013

Full flights, small seats make passengers grumpy

  • airline_passenger_ap.jpg

    Private researchers who have analyzed federal data on airline performance say it's not surprising that passengers are irritated.AP

Airline passenger complaints to the Transportation Department surged by one-fifth last year even though other measures such as on-time arrivals and mishandled baggage show airlines are doing a better job, according to a report being released Monday. 

Private researchers who have analyzed federal data on airline performance say it's not surprising that passengers are irritated. Carriers keep shrinking the size of seats in order to stuff more people into planes. Empty middle seats that might provide a little more room have vanished.

And more people who have bought tickets are being turned away because flights are overbooked. "The way airlines have taken 130-seat airplanes and expanded them to 150 seats to squeeze out more revenue I think is finally catching up with them," said Dean Headley, a business professor at Wichita State University in Kansas who has co-written the annual report for 23 years. "People are saying, 'Look, I don't fit here. Do something about this.' At some point airlines can't keep shrinking seats to put more people into the same tube," he said. 

The industry is even looking at ways to make today's smaller-than-a-broom closet toilets more compact in the hope of squeezing a few more seats onto planes. "I can't imagine the uproar that making toilets smaller might generate," Headley said, especially given that passengers increasingly weigh more than they use to. 

Nevertheless, "will it keep them from flying? I doubt it would." The rate of complaints per 100,000 passengers also rose to 1.43 last year from 1.19 in 2011. In recent years, some airlines have shifted to larger planes that can carry more people, but that hasn't been enough to make up for an overall reduction in flights. 

The rate at which passengers with tickets were denied seats because planes were full rose to 0.97 denials per 10,000 passengers last year, compared with 0.78 in 2011. It used to be in cases of overbookings that airlines usually could find a passenger who would volunteer to give up a seat in exchange for cash, a free ticket or some other compensation with the expectation of catching another flight later that day or the next morning. Not anymore. 

"Since flights are so full, there are no seats on those next flights. So people say, 'No, not for $500, not for $1,000,'" said airline industry analyst Robert W. Mann Jr. Regional carrier SkyWest had the highest involuntary denied-boardings rate last year, 2.32 per 10,000 passengers. 

But not every airline overbooks flights in an effort to keep seats full. JetBlue and Virgin America were the industry leaders in avoiding denied boardings, with rates of 0.01 and 0.07, respectively. United Airlines had the highest consumer complaint rate of the 14 airlines included in the report, with 4.24 complaints per 100,000 passengers. That was nearly double the airline's complaint rate the previous year.

Southwest had the lowest rate, at 0.25. Southwest was among five airlines that lowered complaint rates last year from 2011. The others were American Eagle, Delta, JetBlue and US Airways. 

Consumer complaints were significantly higher in the peak summer travel months of June, July and August when planes are especially crowded. "As airplanes get fuller, complaints get higher because people just don't like to be sardines," Mann said. 

The complaints are regarded as indicators of a larger problem because many passengers may not realize they can file complaints with the Transportation Department, which regulates airlines. At the same time complaints were increasing, airlines were doing a better job of getting passengers to their destinations on time. 

The industry average for on-time arrival rates was 81.8 percent of flights, compared with 80 percent in 2011. Hawaiian Airlines had the best on-time performance record, 93.4 percent in 2012. 

ExpressJet and American Airlines had the worst records with only 76.9 percent of their planes arriving on time last year. The industry's on-time performance has improved in recent years, partly due to airlines' decision to cut back on the number of flights. 

"We've shown over the 20 years of doing this that whenever the system isn't taxed as much — fewer flights, fewer people, less bags — it performs better. It's when it reaches a critical mass that it starts to fracture," Headley said. 

The industry's shift to charging for fees for extra bags, or sometimes charging fees for any bags, has significantly reduced the rate of lost or mishandled bags. Passengers are checking fewer bags than before, and carrying more bags onto planes when permitted. 

The industry's mishandled bag rate peaked in 2007 at 7.01 mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers. It was 3.07 in 2012, down from 3.35 bags the previous year. The report's ratings are based on statistics kept by the department for airlines that carry at least 1 percent of the passengers who flew domestically last year. The research is sponsored by Purdue University in Indiana and by Wichita State.


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 3 tháng 4, 2013

Samoa Air charges passengers by their weight

  • seat_belt_plane_istock.jpg

    Refusing to wear your seat belt is just one way to get kicked off a plane.iStock

Amid a growing debate about how to price airline tickets for so-called passengers of size, an airline that's become the world's first airline to charge passengers by weight is defending its decision, saying it's the system of the future.

Air Samoa, which flies in the Pacific region, including American Samoa, the Cook Islands and Tonga, says its pricing policy that it implemented in January is the fairest way to charge for a ticket. 

Chris Langton, the airline's CEO told ABC Radio about its controversial decision: "People have always travelled on the basis of their seat but as many airline operators, know airlines don't run on seats - they run on weight," he said. "We have worked out a figure per kilo. This is the fairest way of you travelling with your family or yourself. You can put your baggage on, there are no separate fees because of excess baggage - a kilo is a kilo is a kilo."

He added that "the standard width and pitch of seats are changing as people are getting a bit bigger, wider and taller than they were 40 to 50 years ago".

Rates start at $1 per kilo (about 2.2 pounds), which includes the weight of both the flyer and his or her baggage.  For longer routes, rates run as high as $4.16 per kilo.

A statement from Samoa Air said: "You are the master of your air 'fair', you decide how much (or little) your ticket will cost. No more exorbitant excess baggage fees or being charged for baggage you may not carry. Your weight plus your baggage items, is what you pay for. Simple."

The company's website says: "Booking a flight with us is as easy as inputting your approximate weight into our online booking engine (don't worry, we will weigh you again at the airport) – you then can prepay your 'guesstimate', guaranteeing you that much weight is allocated to you for that flight … with Samoa Air, you are the master of how much (or little!) your air ticket will cost."

Just last week Bharat P Bhatta, associate professor of economics at Sogn og Fjordane University College in Norway, recommended in the Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management that air ticket costs be calculated according to a passenger’s weight, sparking outrage among passengers.  Some charged that practice of charge per weight is discriminatory. 

According to the World Health Organization 80 percent of those aged 15 and above in Samoa are considered obese. 


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 2 tháng 4, 2013

Samoa Air charges passengers by their weight

  • seat_belt_plane_istock.jpg

    Refusing to wear your seat belt is just one way to get kicked off a plane.iStock

Amid a growing debate about how to price airline tickets for so-called passengers of size, an airline that's become the world's first airline to charge passengers by weight is defending its decision, saying it's the system of the future.

Air Samoa, which flies in the Pacific region, including American Samoa, the Cook Islands and Tonga, says its pricing policy that it implemented in January is the fairest way to charge for a ticket. 

Chris Langton, the airline's CEO told ABC Radio about its controversial decision: "People have always travelled on the basis of their seat but as many airline operators, know airlines don't run on seats - they run on weight," he said. "We have worked out a figure per kilo. This is the fairest way of you travelling with your family or yourself. You can put your baggage on, there are no separate fees because of excess baggage - a kilo is a kilo is a kilo."

He added that "the standard width and pitch of seats are changing as people are getting a bit bigger, wider and taller than they were 40 to 50 years ago".

Rates start at $1 per kilo (about 2.2 pounds), which includes the weight of both the flyer and his or her baggage.  For longer routes, rates run as high as $4.16 per kilo.

A statement from Samoa Air said: "You are the master of your air 'fair', you decide how much (or little) your ticket will cost. No more exorbitant excess baggage fees or being charged for baggage you may not carry. Your weight plus your baggage items, is what you pay for. Simple."

The company's website says: "Booking a flight with us is as easy as inputting your approximate weight into our online booking engine (don't worry, we will weigh you again at the airport) – you then can prepay your 'guesstimate', guaranteeing you that much weight is allocated to you for that flight … with Samoa Air, you are the master of how much (or little!) your air ticket will cost."

Just last week Bharat P Bhatta, associate professor of economics at Sogn og Fjordane University College in Norway, recommended in the Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management that air ticket costs be calculated according to a passenger’s weight, sparking outrage among passengers.  Some charged that practice of charge per weight is discriminatory. 

According to the World Health Organization 80 percent of those aged 15 and above in Samoa are considered obese. 


View the original article here